Letter to Crown Agents in Nakusp, British Columbia March 24, 2011 - Public Notice


To: Crown Agents in the Office in Nakusp, British Columbia.

Re: Falsification of Public Records

For years the Crown Agents Office refused to let me into the Nakusp Office. They wrote me a letter stating that on April 27, 2006 I did not act appropriately in the Nakusp Office. I was in the office so the social worker could fill out my disability application because I could not use my hands. The comments call me “non-threatening, expressed concerns about being politically persecuted but were not in any way threatening or violent”. The files show purposely misquoted what I said. Why is the ‘letter I wrote to them’ not in THEIR FILES? Hmm?

The public records acquired under the Freedom of Information Act says that they privately conveyed to me that the real reason for the ban was because of a letter I wrote on May 2, 2006. If the reason I was banned from the Nakusp Office was because of a letter I wrote, why did they DELIBERATELY FALSIFY PUBLIC RECORDS and send me a letter stating it was because of the way I acted in their office? Nobody said it was about a letter or I would have addressed that issue. Why the need to tell me one thing and then deliberately falsify their records and tell me something else? What was Marianne Hurlburt trying to cover up? My missing Arbitration?

If the ban was because of a letter I wrote, why did they not tell the truth and say that it was because the letter I wrote was a complaint to the Ombudsman about the Crown Agents not hearing an Arbitration we had outstanding for over a year? I had a Health Ministry order for the landlord to replace the septic after we discovered effluent flowed directly into a creek. Why did they not state in writing that my Arbitration was not heard, after winning two other arbitrations against my landlord because he lied, and that as a consequence I was unlawfully evicted and ended up bad accident that caused me grievous bodily harm? Why the need to cover up the truth by falsifying records in violation of the Canada Evidence Act?

It is not lawful in Canada to arbitrarily restrict the movement of private Canadian citizens with false accusations and falsified records. To lawfully ban Harry James Townsend from government offices, you need to get a court order to do so. That is so a court can ask you why you deliberately falsify your own records and determine if someone is abusing their public authority to cover up their criminal behaviour.

These same files also show that the disability office knew our child tax benefits were exempt, unlawfully required us to account for exempt funds, concluded at the end of their unlawful investigation in which we were assumed guilty that our funds were exempt and still defrauded us of disability payments owed to us for over a year. They concluded we were innocent of this defamation of character. They also participated in the unlawful seizure of our mining claim. Over seventy percent of the money spent on our social programs, like the program for disabled people like me, is spent on the wages of able bodied people like you Agents in the office. Why do we have to crawl like dogs when you make more money on our disabled condition than we do?

Ever wonder why you have to lie and falsify documents if you are in the right?

You may not realize it but your sworn oath of office requires you to operate according to the laws of Canada. As officers of the Crown, all of the records you keep are sworn testimonies. The Canada Evidence Act requires all sworn testimony and evidence to be ‘the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”. There are many contradictions in the files we have obtained under the FOI Act. Any of you would want an apology if you had been treated like this. You say you have zero tolerance for us after we have shown infinite tolerance toward you and been patient in asking you to correct your mistakes. You lie about us and defraud us and have zero tolerance for protest? You have been publicly notified of the truth. Govern yourselves accordingly.

Sincerely,

Harry James Townsend




John Hawks (604) 662-1439 has stolen my money and brochures. As you can see from my prior video, he told me weeks ago that he was sending back my brochures and money and would send me a letter, but never did that until we went into the Post Office in Nakusp to complain on March 18 2011. Please call Mr. Hawks and ask him to return my money and brochures. Remind him that he is a public servant and is an unelected bureaucrat and does not have the right to make up rules that violate my right to free speech of carry on commerce. He also refused to deliver my wifes brochures which advertise her Iridology and Herbal Consulting Business. This is an unacceptable abuse of public office and is outright theft not to give my brochures and money back so I can have them distributed elsewhere.

http://vimeo.com/21369024

http://youtube.com/townsendjim

http://townsend.be

jimi


 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.